Guides
Generic pricing rules on the Specialities List
A generic counts as cost effective only if its ex-factory price undercuts the originator by a staged percentage. The stage depends on the originator's Swiss turnover during the four years before patent expiry. At the same time the FOPH cuts the originator price and sets demand-side incentives.
What price gap Art. 65c of the ordinance requires
Art. 65c of the Health Insurance Ordinance asks a generic not for its own efficacy evidence but for a price gap to the originator. The gap is staged: the larger the originator's Swiss turnover in the four years before patent expiry, the lower the generic's ex-factory price has to be.
The reasoning is simple. In a high volume market, development and registration costs spread across many packs, so a lower unit price remains bearable. In a niche with few patients the same discount would be prohibitive and no generic would reach the market at all.
Staged price gap
The minimum percentage by which a generic's price must undercut the originator, measured against the originator's Swiss turnover in the four years before patent expiry. It is calculated on the ex-factory price, never on the public price.
| Originator turnover over four years | Gap required by the ordinance scale | Market effect |
|---|---|---|
| up to roughly 4 million francs | roughly 20 per cent | niche products stay viable for generic manufacturers |
| roughly 4 to 8 million francs | roughly 40 per cent | first clear saving for mandatory health insurance |
| roughly 8 to 16 million francs | roughly 50 per cent | halving the ex-factory price becomes the normal case |
| roughly 16 to 25 million francs | roughly 60 per cent | several suppliers share a narrow price corridor |
| above roughly 25 million francs | roughly 70 per cent | post-patent blockbuster, maximum discount |
The figures above reproduce the ordinance scale and serve as orientation only. What binds is the wording of Art. 65c in its current version together with the implementing provisions of the Health Care Benefits Ordinance, because thresholds and percentages have been adjusted several times.
Why the originator price falls as well
Patent expiry ends the originator's special status. Under Art. 65e of the ordinance the FOPH reviews the admission conditions as soon as protection has lapsed and cuts the originator's ex-factory price. The cut happens whether or not the authorisation holder files anything.
The foreign price comparison then counts only those reference countries where the patent has also expired. Because prices there fell once generics entered, this pushes the Swiss price down further. The therapeutic cross comparison afterwards brings the newly listed generics into the calculation.
For the originator holder the price therefore drops in two steps: first through the post-patent review, then in the rhythm of the three-yearly review under Art. 65d. A holder who wants to pre-empt the cut can request a voluntary price reduction and avoid a formal decision.
What the foreign price comparison does for a generic
For a generic the foreign price comparison is not the main lever, but it works as a corrective. The primary yardstick stays the gap to the Swiss originator price. Where comparable generics in the reference countries are markedly cheaper, the FOPH can weigh that finding and cut further.
The reference countries are the same as for the originator, the comparison runs at ex-factory level and is converted at the applicable rate. It becomes awkward wherever foreign generic prices arise from tenders or rebate contracts, so that the published price is not the price actually paid.
- Primary test: the percentage gap to the originator in Switzerland.
- Secondary test: the price level of comparable generics in the reference countries.
- In addition: comparison with already listed products containing the same active substance.
The differentiated co-payment as the demand-side lever
Pricing rules act on supply; the differentiated co-payment under Art. 38a of the Health Care Benefits Ordinance acts on demand. If a product with the same active substance is priced above a threshold formed from the cheapest third of those products plus a supplement, the insured person pays 40 rather than 10 per cent.
For an authorisation holder that threshold is the real target price. A generic just below it is dispensed without discussion; a product just above it loses volume, because pharmacy and practice would have to explain the extra cost. The threshold moves with every new admission in the group.
- Medically justified exception in the individual case: the co-payment stays at 10 per cent.
- The deductible is untouched by the differentiated co-payment.
- The threshold is group specific and must be rechecked after every monthly edition of the list.
Co-marketing medicines and how they are priced
A co-marketing medicine rests on the authorisation of a base preparation, is identical to it, but is sold under its own name and often by a different authorisation holder. It is not a generic, because it went through neither its own documentation nor its own authorisation procedure.
Its price therefore follows the base preparation: the ex-factory price may not exceed that of the base preparation, and every cut on the base preparation feeds through. For the differentiated co-payment it counts like any other product with the same active substance when the threshold is formed.
The timetable a generic manufacturer should plan
A company that wants to be listed and able to supply on day one after patent expiry starts roughly two years earlier. Swissmedic authorisation and the SL admission request run in sequence, the FOPH decides within 60-day windows, and any admission takes effect on the first day of a month.
- Roughly 24 months ahead: assemble bioequivalence data and the Swissmedic dossier, check the patent position and any supplementary protection certificate.
- Roughly 12 months ahead: file the authorisation request with Swissmedic, build the distribution and wholesale set-up.
- After authorisation: file the FOPH admission request with the price proposal and evidence of the gap under Art. 65c.
- During assessment: await the Federal Drug Commission opinion and answer FOPH questions inside the running deadline.
- After the decision: wait for publication of the packs and time delivery to the first of the month.
| Stage | Who decides | Fixed points in time |
|---|---|---|
| Swissmedic authorisation | Swissmedic | own procedural deadlines per request type, not coupled to the list |
| SL admission request | FOPH | filed after authorisation, decision within 60-day windows |
| Commission opinion | Federal Drug Commission | annual meeting calendar, advisory role |
| Decision and publication | FOPH | effective on the first of a month, published in the monthly edition |
| Originator price cut | FOPH | post-patent review under Art. 65e of the ordinance |
FAQ
How much cheaper does a generic have to be in Switzerland?
The required gap is not a single figure. It is staged by the originator's Swiss turnover in the four years before patent expiry, running on the ordinance scale from roughly 20 per cent at low turnover to roughly 70 per cent at very high turnover. The calculation always applies to the ex-factory price.
Does the originator price fall automatically when a generic arrives?
Yes. The FOPH reviews the admission conditions after patent expiry under Art. 65e of the Health Insurance Ordinance and cuts the ex-factory price on its own initiative.
- The foreign price comparison keeps only countries without patent protection.
- The therapeutic comparison brings in the newly listed generics.
- A voluntary reduction request avoids a formal decision.
Why does a pharmacy not always dispense the cheapest generic?
Because the distribution share contains a price-linked element: on a very cheap pack the dispensing point earns less in absolute terms. The revision moves remuneration towards a fixed amount per pack and decouples it from price. The differentiated co-payment of 40 per cent then works on the demand side as well.
What is a co-marketing medicine and what does it cost?
It is a medicine identical to a base preparation, resting on that authorisation and sold under its own name. It is not a generic. Its ex-factory price may not exceed the base preparation's, and any cut there feeds through. For the differentiated co-payment it counts like any product with the same active substance.
More guides
Market access
Do you need your product on the Specialities List?
Questions about SL listing, prices or limitations? Contact Swiss Reimbursement.
- Independent directory
- Official FOPH data
- Website in eight languages